Jump to content

Vote limit on Feature Requests????


Recommended Posts

I have been going through the Feature Requests this morning and voting for those I support.

After voting for maybe 10 features I now get the error message "You've run out of votes. Please wait for vote renewal"

WTAF gives - it really does seem to be the most obstructive system ever and quite intentionally designed to hinder and frustrate its use to the point where it simply isnt used and WHMCS assume that there product is perfect ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MrGettingRatherFrustrated said:

intentionally designed to hinder and frustrate its use to the point where it simply isnt used

That's been the general consensus from many of us for some years now.  Hard to use, yet another login, often ignored, and mostly pointless. 
For it to be useful, they'd have to make it far simpler to access and use (like making it part of this board, with polls, maybe, allowing discussion), as well as really go over the things it contains and make decisions based on more than some ephemeral "number of votes to be considered", which seems to be ignored anyway. We've seen some things from there implemented with few votes, and others with many votes closed for "lack of interest". 

"Where good ideas go to die".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bear said:

That's been the general consensus from many of us for some years now.  Hard to use, yet another login, often ignored, and mostly pointless. 
For it to be useful, they'd have to make it far simpler to access and use (like making it part of this board, with polls, maybe, allowing discussion), as well as really go over the things it contains and make decisions based on more than some ephemeral "number of votes to be considered", which seems to be ignored anyway. We've seen some things from there implemented with few votes, and others with many votes closed for "lack of interest". 

"Where good ideas go to die".

So when will they start listening

Yep, accept and reject decisions look to me to be made based on perceived ease of implementation rather than true value and even then there are some key ones apparently being implemented for the last 5 years. The whole thing is a mess.

I'm equally baffled as to why the support team appear to own and be the (sole?) decision makers on product features ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did this all change/start deteriorating some 18 month ago - which appears to be when Matt Pugh resigned as a director?

Who really owns WHMCS now, it looks like it could be John Koston (of cPanel) - curious as the WHMCS website gives the distinct impression that the company is still run by Matt Pugh which seems unlikely if he is no longer a director

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MrGettingRatherFrustrated said:

Did this all change/start deteriorating some 18 month ago - which appears to be when Matt Pugh resigned as a director?

no it long long predates Matt selling his majority shareholding.

4 minutes ago, MrGettingRatherFrustrated said:

Who really owns WHMCS now, it looks like it could be John Koston (of cPanel)

WebPros

4 minutes ago, MrGettingRatherFrustrated said:

curious as the WHMCS website gives the distinct impression that the company is still run by Matt Pugh which seems unlikely if he is no longer a director

nominally he still is - he's a director of the UK holding company that bought the shares in cpanel/whmcs etc

16 minutes ago, wsa said:

They should be back the old way everything was on  the forums.

absolutely - isn't that the definition of a community, to bring people together - not send them off in different directions depending on what they want to do.

17 minutes ago, wsa said:

List bug that peoples find, feature request and what they planning to add etc..

.. and what they're planning on removing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Guidelines and understand your posts will initially be pre-moderated