Jump to content

One of WHMCS Hackers Arrested


wyatt

Recommended Posts

It means nothing, there is a quantum leap from arresting someone on suspicion of a crime to actually prosecuting them successfully...

Further complicated by WHMCS being UK based, so the FBI may wash their hands and pass the matter to UK based Police for extradition proceedings

Any such offender could spend some time waiting for the UK Police to appear and determine if it is worthwhile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Further complicated by WHMCS being UK based, so the FBI may wash their hands and pass the matter to UK based Police for extradition proceedings

Any such offender could spend some time waiting for the UK Police to appear and determine if it is worthwhile

 

but it was server based in the USA with a USA company (hostgator)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This person has been to jail before, didn't act as a much of a deterrent...

However, a round trip via the UK would be a holiday?

 

He may have got out of jail before in the US, but being extradited to the UK, well, the police over here might be thinking differently on the other hand and the consequences could be a lot worse then he thinks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically even though WHMCS is a UK companym UGNazi broke into a server held in a USA datacentre, owned by a USA company (Hostgator) that was leased to a UK company (WHMCS), so this would be dealt with through the USA enforcement system, this is why its an FBI case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically even though WHMCS is a UK companym UGNazi broke into a server held in a USA datacentre, owned by a USA company (Hostgator) that was leased to a UK company (WHMCS), so this would be dealt with through the USA enforcement system, this is why its an FBI case.

 

Very true, but WHMCS is a UK registered Company and therefore they can take as much legal action as the host can because they are the ones who leased the server.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very true, but WHMCS is a UK registered Company and therefore they can take as much legal action as the host can because they are the ones who leased the server.

 

yes but this would have to be done through a USA legal team in the USA as the offence happened in the USA and not in the UK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes but this would have to be done through a USA legal team in the USA as the offence happened in the USA and not in the UK

 

That's the fun part about jurisdiction law....

 

In this case its possible he could be held responsible for breaking laws in the US and in the UK.

 

With internet crimes jurisdiction can get complicated because the borders are blurred. A judge will usually look at the residency of the accused, the location the crime took place and the residency of the victim. My favorite example of this...

 

If resident of state A went to visit state B and stood on the border of state B and shot and killed someone in state C who has jurisdiction? And just because a certain state gets jurisdiction does not always mean that their laws apply. State A could prosecute but apply State B's laws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the fun part about jurisdiction law....

 

In this case its possible he could be held responsible for breaking laws in the US and in the UK.

 

With internet crimes jurisdiction can get complicated because the borders are blurred. A judge will usually look at the residency of the accused, the location the crime took place and the residency of the victim. My favorite example of this...

 

If resident of state A went to visit state B and stood on the border of state B and shot and killed someone in state C who has jurisdiction? And just because a certain state gets jurisdiction does not always mean that their laws apply. State A could prosecute but apply State B's laws.

 

yes but as the crime happened in the USA this is why the FBI is investigating as the server and crime happened in the USA with the victim in the UK, but where is the accused based. so the FBI will have to find a who, when, why, how this happened

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont mean people in jail Bear, I mean to make him an example that doing this stuff will not be allowed... FBI and a long jail term..

 

 

Why? I doubt any inmates would have it in for a computer hacker. Just doesn't seem like something they'd care one way or the other.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if, this being the states, he's in a jurisdiction with the death penalty still on the books.

 

Am I suggesting they do this? No not really, it would be disproportionate. But this sounds like a teen who needs scared straight, and putting him in with supermax inmates for a while, or the death row crowd, would certainly do that.

 

To these kids, it's all fun and games. They know there's little actual law out there that they can actually be held accountable for this **** with, so they go nuts. Thing is the moment they did this to a UK company - the UK have much stricter laws about data protection, etc. If he does get handed over to the UK authorities, he'll probablly get buggered till his rear end falls off.

Edited by Peter M Dodge
Link to comment
Share on other sites

think is will this been seen as serious to have him extrodited to the UK.

 

I know the case the other year when a kid in the UK hacked into the USA defence computer the USA had a job to convince the UK to send him to the USA for trial and that was a more serious crime than what he did to WHMCS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

think is will this been seen as serious to have him extrodited to the UK.

 

I know the case the other year when a kid in the UK hacked into the USA defence computer the USA had a job to convince the UK to send him to the USA for trial and that was a more serious crime than what he did to WHMCS

The case against Gary McKinnon is quite unique, hence why it was so high profile

 

The case against the person or persons that hacked WHMCS is not so unique and people are extradited on a regular basis for such offences now

Extradition usually only takes place if the prosecution and sentence in the external country is likely to be higher

If it fails, then a prosecution can still take place on their return

This is where the case against Gary McKinnon currently is at, the prosecution in the UK is now suspended (and can be resumed if prosecution in USA fails)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems false considering Ugnazi site is still online and as per the post the FBI ceased their site, so ;-/ I would say this is false information.

 

Possible. The same Group hacked mybb.com tonight. Same as WHMCS, a social engineering attack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Guidelines and understand your posts will initially be pre-moderated