Jump to content

problem with Usage Summary


Cantres60

Recommended Posts

Here's the thread where I asked and Matt replied just for verification:

http://www.whmcs.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5335'>http://www.whmcs.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5335

 

 

PPH

 

 

 

Joined: 19 Jan 2007

Posts: 406

Location: GA

 

PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:11 pm Post subject: Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post

This is really sad it worked out this way. I am pleased as we are on CP11 but can see the problem here.

 

Would it have been possible to use a cp10 and a cp11 module? For instance, could the old module be used as a 2nd module and maybe referenced differently for those that need it?

_________________

best regards,

George

Back to top

View user's profile Send private message

Matt

WHMCS Staff

 

 

Joined: 21 Jul 2005

Posts: 3554

Location: UK

 

PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:33 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Sure is - you can just take the module from V3.1.2.

 

Matt

_________________

http://www.whmcs.com

WHMCS Staff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the thread where I asked and Matt replied just for verification:

http://www.whmcs.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5335'>http://www.whmcs.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5335

 

 

PPH

 

 

 

Joined: 19 Jan 2007

Posts: 406

Location: GA

 

PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:11 pm Post subject: Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post

This is really sad it worked out this way. I am pleased as we are on CP11 but can see the problem here.

 

Would it have been possible to use a cp10 and a cp11 module? For instance, could the old module be used as a 2nd module and maybe referenced differently for those that need it?

_________________

best regards,

George

Back to top

View user's profile Send private message

Matt

WHMCS Staff

 

 

Joined: 21 Jul 2005

Posts: 3554

Location: UK

 

PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:33 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Sure is - you can just take the module from V3.1.2.

 

Matt

_________________

http://www.whmcs.com

WHMCS Staff

 

Great. Any idea if we can just rename the modules folders as cpanel_10 and cpanel_11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WHMCS CEO
Right, i dont think matt consults the server modules for disk usage. Even though thats the way it should work.

Not at all. You're very quick to criticise all the time, but often wrongly in my opinion. And no, renaming the folders won't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Guidelines and understand your posts will initially be pre-moderated