HarisKCS Posted July 23, 2007 Share Posted July 23, 2007 I have been with WHMCS for over a year now and with a assistant like Matt there is always advantages even though there are some disadvantages. When I first came into the Internet business society I looked at the cheapest billing system a friend had reffered me to... ClientExec. Not in any rude way but it was absolutely crap there. Their support area would reply to you ticket after around 10+ hours. You cannot have your cpanel account automatically created. When my friend then reffered me to WHMCS, I was amazed at its features, before I bought it I actually didnt bother looking for its features I just went straight for it because I knew from that first moment I entered the website, this is the right one for me. My first step of success. But the question is...Which of my wishes came true? I always wanted things to be more easier, in life the most easiest thing could ever be is having WHMCS create web hosting account immediately and so I had more spare time, I did not need to always be on to create web hosting accounts manually from my Web Host Manager. So who actually agree's with me then? I hope WHMCS did help you too, many people say Modern Bill is better, I say No, when I saw their price, I thought no way, I was a client of a modern bill system user at a server company and it was dam hard to figure out how to navigate, things wer'nt so easy, I thought it will take hours to learn how to navigate round here, so I thought best thing to do is learn how to pay invoices every month and submit tickets for help, I learnt nothing more and exploring Modern Bill systems was like your inside a server working on the codes, if you click on the wrong button the whole systems corrupted. I thought No...Let me stay the way I am. Oright, thats it for now then...Have a nice time everyone, and Matt! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sohan Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 I agree and disagree. Both systems have around the same level of support / updates and both create accounts automatically. At the end, I think clientexec is a lighter product, but I must say, it's not by much. I would use clientexec for 5,000 clients or less, but after you get more, it's going to become hard. WHMCS has features to handle more than that, and less. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarisKCS Posted July 24, 2007 Author Share Posted July 24, 2007 I agree and disagree. Both systems have around the same level of support / updates and both create accounts automatically. At the end, I think ClientExec is a lighter product, but I must say, it's not by much. I would use ClientExec for 5,000 clients or less, but after you get more, it's going to become hard. WHMCS has features to handle more than that, and less. There again Sohan, I was talking about the past year ago, when client exec didnt havnt features WHMCS did. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianoz Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 My personal experience was that ModernBill support was nowhere near as good as WHMCS's. For me the difference WHMCS makes is in it's user interface; it is just so easy to learn and use. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.