I completely understand where this reaction comes from — the traditional WHMCS audience is very IT-proficient and comfortable running their own infrastructure.
That said, we’ve actually been getting requests for a hosted or managed version for quite a few years now. More recently, we’ve also seen growing interest from partners who sell services outside or adjacent to traditional hosting — agencies, MSPs, and other service providers who need a billing and automation platform but don’t want (or can’t justify) the overhead of maintaining servers just to run WHMCS.
Many of our existing reseller-focused partners have also told us that hosting WHMCS itself isn’t really a profit driver for them. What matters more is helping their customers get to market faster and with less operational burden.
So while it may not seem immediately valuable to long-time users, there is a real demand for it in adjacent markets — and ultimately, the work we’re doing here will also benefit the self-hosted version by driving improvements in compliance, scalability, and reliability across the board.