RPS Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 For the majority of the time, do the WHMCS upgrades mess with the template system? Or are most of the upgrades mainly core files? I plan to completely skin WHMCS, but I don't want to have to reskin it every time there is an update. How often do clients usually need to reskin the system? Is it just with major release versions (such as v1 to v2, or v2 to v3)? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 MACscr Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 your going to edit your templates on each upgrade. I know its a bitch and it always will be. I have to look at the new templates and compare them against the old originals, then pick out what i need to move to my custom ones. I have rewritten about 90% of the code, so i guess thats what im stuck with doing. To bad the templates arent written well enough (no damn tables) so that we could just sweet css files for our changes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 polarbear Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 This is a drawback. I too would like to see this controlled by CSS. However, I'd also like to see the posibility of using php includes in the templates, this would also remove the need for doing much copy/paste of html code. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 WHMCS CEO Matt Posted January 11, 2008 WHMCS CEO Share Posted January 11, 2008 your going to edit your templates on each upgrade Although you don't need to edit them all, just the ones which have changed which are listed in the readme file and we always try to keep the number down to a minimum. Matt 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 MACscr Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 This is a drawback. I too would like to see this controlled by CSS. However, I'd also like to see the posibility of using php includes in the templates, this would also remove the need for doing much copy/paste of html code. you can {php_include file="test.php"} 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 RPS Posted January 11, 2008 Author Share Posted January 11, 2008 Thanks for the clarification. Editing smarty templates is pretty common with all software upgrades, I didn't expect this one to be different, but still wanted to ask. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 herpherp Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 However, I'd also like to see the posibility of using php includes in the templates {include_php file="/home/myusername/public_html/header.php"} you may have to use the absolute path instead of just /header.php I use this to include my page header and footer in header.tpl & footer.tpl etc... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 vethost Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 Skinning sounds like a royal pain, but what choices do users have and where can they be seen? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 RPS Posted January 19, 2008 Author Share Posted January 19, 2008 Skinning is VERY easy with WHMCS. 95% of the changes you made, are done to 2 files. Most of my changes were on header/footer. I did have to edit 18 other files because a common area to change (the page title), has to be changed on EVERY file. I already put the suggestion in with Matt to make it so you only have to edit a single file to update the title style for every page. If this sounds something you would like to see, please reply to http://forum.whmcs.com/showthread.php?t=8205 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
RPS
For the majority of the time, do the WHMCS upgrades mess with the template system? Or are most of the upgrades mainly core files?
I plan to completely skin WHMCS, but I don't want to have to reskin it every time there is an update.
How often do clients usually need to reskin the system? Is it just with major release versions (such as v1 to v2, or v2 to v3)?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
8 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.